niedziela, 16 października 2011

Occupy Wall Street Cleanup Delayed, What Next?

Young demonstrators in Zuccotti Park tells MTV News they 'can't easily be thrown out of this space.'
By Joel Hanek


Photo: Mario Tama/ Getty Images

NEW YORK — On a damp Friday morning (October 14), thousands of protesters assembled in the city's Zuccotti Park let out cheers of elation and relief. They had been facing what seemed to be an imminent confrontation with the New York Police Department after Mayor Michael Bloomberg visited the park on Wednesday evening and announced that a crew would move in to clean the area forcing the temporary eviction of demonstrators.

While Occupiers were prepared to resist the mandatory evacuation, in the end, the private company that owns the park decided at the 11th hour to postpone any cleaning efforts. MTV News was on site at Occupy Wall Street in the early dawn hours tracking all of the events as they went down.

At about 6 a.m. ET on Friday, organizers conducted a special general assembly of the Occupy Wall Street movement, informing the crowd that committed supporters who chose to stay in the park once the cleaners turned up would likely face arrest by the NYPD. But then, with minutes to go before the expected standoff, an organizer reported that were was "breaking news."

She went on to read a statement off of her iPhone, announced to the crowd, "I have an announcement from Brookfield Properties. I'd like to read a brief statement from Deputy Mayor Halloway: 'Late last night we received notice from the owners of Zuccotti Park, Brookfield Properties, that they are postponing their cleaning.' "

Supporters erupted into cheers and used designated Occupy sign language to express their approval. Soon, they were chanting "The people united / Will never be defeated."

Aaron Khandros, a student at Connecticut's Wesleyan University, had traveled to New York City to show his support, knowing well that he might face arrest if he refused to leave the park. "We came out here because we thought that people were going to come out here and try and shut it down, that Bloomberg was using this cleaning thing as an excuse," he explained. "This seemed like one of our last chances to express our solidarity with this crowd, so we came as quickly as we could."

Emma Francis-Snyder, an organizer with the Occupy Wall Street outreach program, had been on site since 4 p.m. on Thursday afternoon. Exhausted (but also rather thrilled) by the events of the previous 48 hours, she explained how the group had spent an anxious night.

"We've relocated a bunch of our materials to a storage space because we weren't sure what was going to happen," Francis-Snyder said, citing the experiences of Occupy Denver and Occupy Austin, where movements had been shut down under the pretext of sanitation.

In a bid to be proactive, the Wall Street occupiers decided to clean the park themselves. "There was a lot of stress throughout the night just trying to clean," Francis-Snyder said hours before the postponement was announced. "There were people working endlessly, tirelessly, trying to gather all of our belongings; trying to figure out what to do with them, where to go. It is what it is — whatever's going to happen, is going to happen."

Although they had prepared for the worst, some demonstrators said the final outcome was not unexpected.

"I think I was in shock. I wasn't entirely surprised because if you come out here, there are at least maybe 2,000 people out here, and I think that the Mayor knows that the whole world is watching," Senia Barragan, an organizer with Occupy Wall Street's press committee, told MTV News. "And they know that we're a serious movement that can't easily be thrown out of this space.

Share your thoughts on the Occupy Wall Street movement in our comments section.

Related Videos

Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1672558/occupy-wall-street-cleanup.jhtml

Anna Kournikova Anna Paquin AnnaLynne McCord Anne Marie Kortright April Scott

1 komentarz:

  1. If only those of Occupy Wall Street knew the truth, then they could ask for something worthwhile.

    They could for instance be asking for capital requirements based on job creation ratings, because, if as tax payers we are to be the ultimate pick-uppers of any bank crisis, then we should at least be certain that the purpose of the banks is acceptable to us.

    Right now, the only purpose for the banks that the regulators have de-facto defined, by means of allowing ridiculous low capital requirements for banks when lending to what is ex-ante perceived as not risky, and which allows immensely high leverage of bank equity, is for the banks to make huge profits… and that, as purposes come, seems a bit vulgar and dumb, to say the least.

    (Dumb because never ever do systemic bank crises occur as a result of excessive exposure to what is perceived as “risky”, they only result from excessive exposures to what is ex-ante perceived as “not-risky”, and which are in fact the only exposures able to generate huge unpleasant surprises.)

    If you allow me here is a video explaining current regulatory madness it in an apolitical red and blue! http://bit.ly/mQIHoi

    OdpowiedzUsuń